Legal Opinion · Dissent

Florida Limousine Service, Inc. v. Bevis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 20, 1974No. Nos. 43908, 43974 and 43990Published

1DissentMcCain, Justice

I must dissent for a very cogent reason and trust that the majority has not created an Avernus by their Per Curiam denial of certiorari in these consolidated cases.

A statement of the salient facts is indispensable to the ultimate conclusion in this cause. This can be summarized as follows :

By application to the Florida Public Service Commission American Limousine Service Inc.-applicant sought a certificate of public convenience and necessity as a common motor carrier, authorizing transportation of passengers and their baggage between motels, hotels, tourist attractions, commercial airports,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Armored Service, Inc. v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Fleet Transport Co. of Florida v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Camp Lumber Co. v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Turf Express, Inc. v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. Daytona Beach Limousine Service, Inc. v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API