Legal Opinion
Philbrick v. Azar II
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 29, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-0773Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMUEL PHILBRICK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-773 (JEB) ALEX M. AZAR II, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In November 2018, the Secretary of Health and Human Services approved the State of New Hampshire’s proposal to impose work requirements on a significant share of its Medicaid recipients. Under the proposal, most non-disabled Medicaid beneficiaries ages 19 to 64 would be required to demonstrate that they have completed 100 hours of qualifying employment or other “community-engagement” activities each month (or…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.