Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 1985No. 85-424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In his appeal from the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief, appellant raises only one point which appears to have merit. He asserts that the court erred in retaining jurisdiction over one half of his sentence without informing him of this possibility prior to accepting his guilty plea.

In State v. Green, 421 So.2d 508, 510 (Fla.1982), our supreme court said that, “if a judge wishes to retain jurisdiction, a defendant must be advised, prior to pleading guilty or nolo contendere, that the court can retain jurisdiction over a part of the sentence.” In Crawford v. State, 438 So.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Harmon, Iii, 080164 v. Tom L. Barton, Robert ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API