Pintur v. Germann
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley
This appeal arises from a negligence action filed in the circuit court by Robert T. Pintur and his father, Robert R. Pintur (plaintiffs), seeking damages from Jeff Germann and his father, Carl Germann (defendants), for injuries sustained by Robert T. in an incident involving an automobile driven by Jeff and owned by Carl. The circuit court granted defendants’ section 2 — 619 motion to dismiss (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 619) because the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) barred their common-law action. We affirm.
Section 5(a) of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orsini v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Fisher Body Division v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Rogers v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Roberts & Oake v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Handzel v. Kane-Miller Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Sangster v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Flynn v. RathnauAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990