Legal Opinion

Pintur v. Germann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1989No. 1-88-0536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

This appeal arises from a negligence action filed in the circuit court by Robert T. Pintur and his father, Robert R. Pintur (plaintiffs), seeking damages from Jeff Germann and his father, Carl Germann (defendants), for injuries sustained by Robert T. in an incident involving an automobile driven by Jeff and owned by Carl. The circuit court granted defendants’ section 2 — 619 motion to dismiss (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 619) because the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) barred their common-law action. We affirm.

Section 5(a) of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orsini v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Fisher Body Division v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Rogers v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Roberts & Oake v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Handzel v. Kane-Miller Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Sangster v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Flynn v. RathnauAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API