Legal Opinion

Chiodo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 28, 1986No. 85-1436Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Patrick Chiodo, appealing from a sentence imposed after probation violations, maintains that the trial judge erred in sentencing him in excess of the guidelines’ recommended range. We agree, reverse and remand for resentencing.

*160Chiodo originally pleaded nolo conten-dere to resisting an officer with violence, to related charges of driving while intoxicated and the violation of a driver’s license restriction. Pursuant to the recommendation of the sentencing guidelines the trial court placed him on five years probation. Subsequently, however, Chiodo’s probation officer filed an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API