Chiodo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
Patrick Chiodo, appealing from a sentence imposed after probation violations, maintains that the trial judge erred in sentencing him in excess of the guidelines’ recommended range. We agree, reverse and remand for resentencing.
*160Chiodo originally pleaded nolo conten-dere to resisting an officer with violence, to related charges of driving while intoxicated and the violation of a driver’s license restriction. Pursuant to the recommendation of the sentencing guidelines the trial court placed him on five years probation. Subsequently, however, Chiodo’s probation officer filed an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hendrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986