Legal Opinion

Poff v. IBP, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 11, 2005No. 92,020PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Dick L. Poff appeals the order of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) concerning compensation paid as a result of multiple injuries during his employment at IBP, Inc. Poff argues the Board erred in separating each of his claims and should have considered the cumulative effect of all injuries. He contends the Board erred in finding that he was not permanently and totally disabled and that his claim for work-related hearing ioss was untimely. IBP cross-appeals the Board’s decision that Poff s varicose vein condition was work related. We affirm.

Poff worked at IBP for 31 years…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  2. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Demars v. Rickel Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Neal v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bryant v. MIDWEST STAFF SOLUTIONS, INC.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Nam Le v. Armour Eckrich MeatsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  3. Wimp v. American Highway TechnologyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. Johnson v. Johnson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Myers v. Lincoln Center Ob/Gyn, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API