Legal Opinion
Rudhlan Amusement Corp. v. Geraghty
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
This is an application by the Rudhlan Amusement Corporation for a peremptory order of mandamus requiring the commissioner of licenses of the city of New York to issue forthwith to the petitioner a theatre license for the Eltinge Theatre.
The petitioner alleges that it is a lessee of the Eltinge Theatre, located at 236 West Forty-second street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, where it has been operating and conducting theatrical performances of the character known as “ burlesque;” that prior to May 1, 1932, such performances were operated under a license issued by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. CruiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People v. WendlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of Agoglia v. MulrooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dadukian v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- STATE EX REL. GOPHER SALES CO. v. City of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Tammaro v. BruckmanNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Barton Trucking Corp. v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Hood Restaurant, Inc. v. WallanderNew York Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.