Legal Opinion

James v. Tooke

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 2006No. 40,641-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

pThe plaintiffs, Eugene James, individually and d/b/a E.J. Construction Company, and Dorothy James, appeal a judgment in favor of defendant, S. Judd Tooke. The district court granted defendant’s exception of prescription. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

In 1985 Eugene James, individually and d/b/a E.J. Construction Company, and Dorothy James (collectively referred to as “James”) retained attorney S. Judd Tooke to provide legal representation in a contract dispute. On February 18, 1988, Tooke filed a lawsuit on behalf of James against C. Markham Dickson and others,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dixon v. LA STATE UNIV. MEDICAL CENTERLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Alexander v. FulcoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Smith v. BootheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Kavanaugh v. EdwardsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API