Glass v. Glass

OPINION

By HUNSICKER, J.

In this appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Probate Court of Scioto County, the appellant, Earl F. Glass, says that:

“1. The judgment and finding of the trial court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

“2. The judgment and finding of the trial court is contrary to law.

“3. The trial court erred in the admission of the evidence offered by the appellees to .which the appellant objected.

“4. The judgment of the trial court should have been that the appellant, Earl F. Glass, was entitled to share in the distribution of the estate of Earl B. Glass, deceased.”

The…