In Re Sealed Case No. 99-3096(brady Obligations)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
The defendant in this criminal case contends that the government improperly denied his repeated requests for information to which he was entitled under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The government responds that because the information, if it exists, would relate to the impeachment of a defense witness, it falls outside the obligations imposed by Brady. Defendant replies that impeachment information always comes within the ambit of Brady, regardless whether the witness testifies…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mejia, RafaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Toms, RonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.