Legal Opinion

Florance v. Mercantile National Bank at Dallas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1985No. C0-83-1292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

We granted a petition for further review from the decision of the Court of Appeals holding valid an attempt by a settlor to amend his trust by a handwritten letter and remanding the case to the Minnesota trial court to ascertain the meaning of the letter amendment. See Matter of Florance, 343 N.W.2d 297 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). We affirm the Court of Appeals’ holding to the extent it has ruled on certain issues of validity of the letter amendment, but we remand to the trial court to determine, under forum non conveniens, whether trial of the remaining issues should be in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of FloranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API