Legal Opinion

Freyaldenhoven v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1950No. 4624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

TMs appeal is from a judgment by which the appellant was fined $600 for the offense of selling intoxicating liquor in a dry county.

The appellant contends that the State failed to prove that what he sold was intoxicating liquor. Lee Mode testified that on the night of the offense he refused to allow his son Gerald, a confirmed alcoholic, to order whiskey by telephone. Gerald then went off in a taxi, and Lee followed in his car. He testified that Gerald stopped at the appellant’s house and entered the kitchen. Lee watched through the window and saw the appellant hand Gerald a half pint of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shank v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tarkington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Wiley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. State v. ChernovConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API