Legal Opinion
County of Washington v. Murray
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 15, 1909No. 5946PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Washington District Court—Hon. E. E. Armour, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
May 5, 1904, appellee filed with appellant the following order of the district court within and for the county of Washington, to wit:
“State of Colorado, County of Washington—ss.
“In the District Court, No. 129.
“The People of the State of Colorado vs. George I. Tuttle, Perry Tuttle, D. W. Irwin, Prank Irwin, Elmer Shanks, and Clinton Dansdill.
“In this action Charles A. Murray, Esq., having been appointed by the court, upon proper showing, to defend as to the defendants Elmer Shanks, Prank Irwin and Clinton Dansdill, and the trial in said cause having been had, and said Murray having acted under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Mackey v. BriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Smith v. District Court of Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- Board of County Commissioners v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Lyon v. WashburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930