Chemicraft Corp.v. Honeywell Protection Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about August 4, 1989, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve, nunc pro tunc, a supplemental summons and amended complaint substituting a new plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs commenced this action in October 1981 to recover for water damage to certain property alleged to have occurred on December 27, 1980. In November 1988, plaintiffs moved to amend the complaint to substitute a different corporation, Perforated Specialties Co., Inc., as the sole plaintiff. Plaintiffs contended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bellini v. Gersalle Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Neggy Travel Service, Inc. v. Sabena Belgian World AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Manhattan Plaza, Inc. v. Air Tech Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Insurance Co. of WausauNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Burke, Albright, Harter & Rzepka LLP v. SillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Kohl v. FuscoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
- Pecora v. PecoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022