Legal Opinion
Frank v. Wolf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 8, 1904Published
Action by Betty Frank and others against George Wolf and others. From an order denying a motion to discontinue the action as against certain defendants, and to amend summons and pleadings by striking the names of such defendants therefrom, plaintiffs appeal.
1Per curiam
For the reasons stated in the opinion in Chapman et al. v. Wolf (herewith handed down) 85 N. Y. Supp. 638, the order appealed from should be reversed, and the motion granted, without costs, with leave to the defendant respondent to answer anew, if so advised.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chapman v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904