Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 20, 1941No. 4-6280PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtG-reenhaw, J.
The appellants, Sarah J. Reynolds and her four children, Lavell Reynolds, Lamar Reynolds, Marzell Reynolds and Lamae Reynolds, brought suit in the Union circuit court as the widow and sole heirs at laAv of Alfred M. Reynolds, deceased, against the appellee, New York Life Insurance Company, to recover the sum of $200 alleged to be due under a disability provision in an insurance policy issued to the said Alfred M. Reynolds by the appellee on January 20, 1920. A jury was waived and the cause was tried by the court upon certain stipulations as to facts, the other evidence introduced being the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Peek Estate v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Nehls v. SauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- New York Life Insurance v. FinkelsteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Levy v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell & Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Silverman v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- C & L Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. KincadeDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1960
- Horton v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Campbell & Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991