Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mecosta County Board of Commissioners v. Michigan Council 25

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1988No. Docket Nos. 95106, 95107Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partM. J. Kelly, P.J.

I concur in the result reached in Parts i and n of the majority opinion. However, because I agree with the merc’s determination that the four deputy positions should not be included in a supervisory bargaining unit, I dissent from Part m of the majority opinion.

"Determination of a collective bargaining unit is a finding of fact, not to be overturned by this Court if it is supported by competent, material and substantial evidence.” UAW v Sterling Heights, 163 Mich App 8, 11; 413 NW2d 716 (1987).

The determination by merc that the four deputy positions are not supervisory is supported by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API