Sasscer v. Young
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the equity side of Prince George's county court. The present bill was filed by the appellant on the 27th of November, 1833, for an injunction, and general relief against a judgment in favor of Young, one of the appellees. rendered by the court of Appeals at June term, 1833, against the appellant, as one of the sureties of the other appellee, Kemp.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the equity side of Prince George's county court. The present bill was filed by the appellant on the 27th of November, 1833, for an injunction, and general relief against a judgment in favor of Young, one of the appellees. rendered by the court of Appeals at June term, 1833, against the appellant, as one of the sureties of the other appellee, Kemp. In addition to the facts charged in the bill, as stated by the judge who delivered the opinion of the court, there is the following allegation. “That the said executors, if they have never received the money, have lost it by their own…
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
The bill of complaint in this case alleges, that a judgment was obtained in 1817, by Young, Emack, and McCormick, as executors of Walker, against Kemp, winch was after-wards revived by scire facias between the same parties, and on appeal to this court affirmed at June term, 1826.
A fieri facias issued on this judgment, was levied on certain real property in Prince George’s county, which not having been sold, “two or three” writs of venditioni exponas were successively issued, to the last of which the sheriff returned, “not sold by order of the plaintiff’s order,” and no further process has…
2Cited by10 opinions
- McShane v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Barr v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
- Strawbridge v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Johnson v. FlintSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Warner v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.