Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Montague Corporation v. Burton Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 11, 1926No. 11896Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy:

I concur in the result of the opinion of Mr. Justice Cothran; but I do not thereby assent to the suggestion of his Honor, Judge Shipp, that a tender could have been postponed, in the first instance, beyond July 4, 1912; agreeing with him, however, that the party in interest did all that was required to be done to preserve its rights.

Mr. Justice Watts:

This is an appeal from a decree of his Honor, Judge Shipp, for specific performance of a contract for the purchase of timber. The exceptions, twelve in number, raise the questions:

“(1) That there is no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Page v. . ShainwaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Walton v. . StaffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. A. C. Tuxbury Lumber Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Glenn v. EddySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  5. Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API