Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kent v. Kent

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1942Published

1DissentJustice Dady

In my opinion the judgment of the trial court is palpably and manifestly against the weight of the evidence, and should be reversed.

Plaintiff, Kenneth Kent, hereinafter referred to as “Kent,” and defendant G-eorgia Kent were married November 17,1933. Their only child, William, was born July 31,1934.

On November 9, 1935, Kent obtained a decree of divorce from G-eorgia Kent on the ground of desertion, which decree awarded the custody of the boy to the maternal grandmother, Amy Dietzel. The decree ordered Kent to pay Amy Dietzel $2.50 a week for the support of the boy.

On September 27,1941, Kent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Stockham v. SchaedelIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mahon v. People ex rel. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Umlauf v. UmlaufIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hewitt v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People ex rel. Kuhn v. WeeksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API