Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Buehler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill of Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H, Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

By the common law, choses in action were not assignable, and consequently the purchaser of a chose in action could not enforce the same in an action at law in his own name. He did acquire an equitable right thereto, which a court of equity would enforce, but subject to all equities existing between the assignor and the debtor.

Following this rule, the Supreme Court of this State, in the case of Olds v. Cummings, 31 Ill. 138, held that the assignee of a mortgage takes it subject to the infirmities and defenses to which it was subject in the hands of the assignor. A mortgage is but an incident…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peoria & Springfield Railroad v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Miller v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Towner v. McClellandIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Walker v. DementIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Sumner v. WaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elser v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API