Norman v. Kentucky Board of Managers
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 96 —MANDAMUS— appeal prom pranklin circuit court. 1. An appropriation of money to make an exhibit of the resources of the State at the World’s Fair, along with similar exhibits from other States and nations of the world, was a valid exercise of legislative power. (Daggett v. Oolgan, 92 Cal., 53 ; 27 Am.
Read the full summary
Case 96 —MANDAMUS— appeal prom pranklin circuit court. 1. An appropriation of money to make an exhibit of the resources of the State at the World’s Fair, along with similar exhibits from other States and nations of the world, was a valid exercise of legislative power. (Daggett v. Oolgan, 92 Cal., 53 ; 27 Am. St. Rep., 95; Kingman v. Brockton, 153 Mass., 255; Gilford v. Supervisors, 13 N. Y., 149; Loan Association v. Topeka, 20 Wall., 665; Weisner v. Village, 64 N. Y., 91 ; Cooley on Taxation, 2d ed., 103; Zigler v. Menges, 16 Am. St. Rep., 369; Barbour v. Board of Trade, 82 Ky., 664.) 2. As…
1Dissent
JUDGE PRYOR
delivered the following dissenting opinion:
On the 9th of February, 1892, and during the present legislative session, a bill was introduced in the Senate, ■entitled “A bill to provide for the collection and exhibition of the resources and evidences of the progress of the State of Kentucky at the World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893.” The bill contained an appropriation of one hundred thousand dollars for that purpose, and placed that sum under the control of a Board of *556Managers, who were required to execute a bond for the-faithful discharge of their duties, and to draw the money…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The People v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Legg v. Mayor of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- State ex rel. Minnesota Railway Construction Co. v. City of HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Hall v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.