Legal Opinion

Preston v. Preston

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was entitled to have the allegations of the complaint accepted as the true facts with every fair intendment drawn in their favor.

The amount in suit was for five payments of $200 each due and payable under the judgment of a Florida court on the 5th and 20th days of November and December, 1940, and the 5th day of Janu*82ary, 1941, totaling $1,000. The amounts to be paid, as fixed in the judgment, were definite and unconditional. (Rosbach v. Sackett & Wilhelms Co., 134 App. Div. 130.) The amounts of alimony are past due and defendant has not shown that he has made any application to vary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Van Loon v. Van LoonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Pottinger v. PottingerSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Hess v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conwell v. ConwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Toms v. TomsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Abreu v. AbreuNew York City Family Court · 1965
  4. Forbes v. GalwayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Papatsos v. AndreadisNew York Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API