Legal Opinion

Williamson Heater Co. v. Whitmer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 25, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — J. W. Anderson, Judge. Aotion at law upon a contract of guaranty. There was a directed verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

*11161' tion^uSputea faots' *1115On September 29, 1917, a partnership known as Denkman & Herms was doing business at Sioux City, Iowa. *1116Tbe firm was at that time indebted to the Williamson Heater Company, a corporation at Cincinnati, Ohio, in the sum of $1,042.08. In consideration of an extension of the time for payment of this sum, then past due, the defendant herein, George ft. Whitmer, entered into a written contract of guaranty, the material terms of which were stated in the following words:

“Now, therefore, it is hereby agreed that in the consideration of the said The Williamson Heater. Company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schoonover v. Osborne Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Citizens' Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. Cook v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. Gordon v. Wright County Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Goff v. MillironSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API