Legal Opinion
JOHNSON v. SAUL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 29, 2021No. 5:20-cv-03111Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PETER JAMES JOHNSON, : : Plaintiff, : v. : CIVIL ACTION : COMMISSIONER OF : NO. 20-3111 SOCIAL SECURITY, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Peter James Johnson (“Johnson” or “Plaintiff”) seeks review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) decision denying his claims for Child’s Disability Insurance Benefits (“Child’s DIB”) pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act and for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) pursuant to Title XVI of the Act.1 For the reasons…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.