Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceTraynor, J.
I concur in the judgment, but I believe the manufacturer’s negligence should no longer be singled out as the basis of a plaintiff’s right to recover in cases like the present one. In my opinion it should now be recognized that a manufacturer incurs an absolute liability when an article that he has placed on the market, knowing that it is to be used, without' inspection, proves to have a defect that causes inju^ to human beings. McPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 382 [111 N.E. 1050, Ann.Cas. 1916C 440, L.R.A. 1916F established the principle, recognized by this court, t spective of privity of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.