Legal Opinion
Evanston Ins. Co., Inc. v. Merin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-3743PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs in this matter challenge the right of the State of New Jersey to impose fees upon them for issuing coverage insuring persons or property within the state. Primarily plaintiffs contest the constitutionality of the statute here in question on the ground that surplus lines insurance companies do not, indeed are not permitted to, do business in this state. All business of this nature must be conducted through authorized surplus lines brokers, and plaintiffs contend that they have no presence in this state which properly subjects them to…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Avco Financial Services Consumer Discount Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Indus. Dev. Assoc. v. Commercial Union Surplus Lines Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Virgin Islands Bar Ass'n v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Department of InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.