Legal Opinion

GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1996No. CC 9209-06143; CA A81171; SC S42285PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*118VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

This case involves the so-called “merchant’s exception” to the statute of frauds in the Oregon Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). ORS 72.2010(2).1 Plaintiffs (GPL)2 sued defendant Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) seeking damages for breach of an alleged oral contract to buy 88 truckloads of cedar shakes. L-P denied the alleged contract and asserted the UCC statute of frauds, ORS 72.2010(1), as an affirmative defense. GPL relied on the merchant’s exception. ORS 72.2010(2). The trial court denied L-P’s motions in limine to exclude evidence of the “writing” that GPL sent to L-P and for a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bazak International Corp. v. Mast Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Conant v. StroupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Edward D. Jones & Co. v. MishlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Bend Tarp and Liner, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Peterson v. McCAVICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API