GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*118VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
This case involves the so-called “merchant’s exception” to the statute of frauds in the Oregon Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). ORS 72.2010(2).1 Plaintiffs (GPL)2 sued defendant Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) seeking damages for breach of an alleged oral contract to buy 88 truckloads of cedar shakes. L-P denied the alleged contract and asserted the UCC statute of frauds, ORS 72.2010(1), as an affirmative defense. GPL relied on the merchant’s exception. ORS 72.2010(2). The trial court denied L-P’s motions in limine to exclude evidence of the “writing” that GPL sent to L-P and for a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Bazak International Corp. v. Mast Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Conant v. StroupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Edward D. Jones & Co. v. MishlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Bend Tarp and Liner, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Peterson v. McCAVICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.