Legal Opinion

Michael E. Black Profit Sharing Plan v. Stephens

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided August 18, 1998No. 07-97-0369-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Senior Justice (Retired).

This appeal requires us to determine whether the trial court correctly held that lienholder Curtis Johnson, the named loss payee in a policy of fire insurance issued to Jack Alexander Stephens, was entitled to all the policy proceeds to the exclusion of hen-holder Michael E. Black Profit Sharing Plan (Black), with whose predecessor Stephens contracted to, but did not, name as a loss payee. Crediting the court with a correct holding, we will affirm.

To construct a house on property he was developing in a rural area of Randall County, Stephens secured four…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Corp. v. Super-Cold Southwest Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Great American Ins.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Hermann Hospital v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Ditmore Land & Cattle Company v. HicksTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Moffett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Safeguard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Sierra Equipment, Incorporated v. Lexington InsuraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API