Legal Opinion

Baronne Building, Inc. v. Mahoney

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1931No. 13,523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

This is a suit by a landlord for rent claimed to be due by a tenant and also for the costs expended by the landlord in a previous ejectment proceeding.

The tenant, Mahoney, was occupying space in the building of plaintiff, Baronne Building, Inc., at a monthly rental of $55.

The installments due on September 1st, October 1st, November 1st, and December 1st, 1927, were not paid and the landlord instituted ejectment proceedings, electing not to act under the “acceleration” clause of the lease, which permitted it to declare all future installments due. The ejectment proceedings were fixed for trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keenan v. FlaniganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Goldstein v. StoneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Purnell v. DugueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ouachita Nat. Bank v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Keenan v. LegardeurLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. Classified Parking SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Lacour v. MyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API