Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Marriage of Coomer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1993No. 03A04-9304-CV-149Published

1DissentHoffman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The decree of dissolution was entered on December 21,1992. The praecipe, along with a request for extension of time within which to file the praecipe, was filed on February 1,1993. In his request for an extension, Roger alleged that he did not receive a copy of the decree until January 2, 1992. Ind. Trial Rule 72(E) states:

“Effect of Lack of Notice. Lack of notice, or the lack of the actual receipt of a copy of the entry from the Clerk shall not affect the time within which to contest the ruling, order or judgment, or authorize the Court to relieve a party of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clausen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. International Fidelity Insurance Co. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API