Coppley v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentGreene, Judge
I read the majority as holding that an opinion and award (opinion) of the full Commission is valid if two of the commissioners, who are authorized to act (i.e. have not retired), indicate their written concurrence to the opinion at the time of its filing. This is so, according to my reading of the majority’s opinion, even if the third commissioner is no longer authorized to act as a commissioner at the time of the filing. I disagree with this holding and I, therefore, dissent.
In my opinion, there must be three commissioners authorized to act at the time the opinion is signed and at the time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Estes v. N.C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Pearson v. C. P. Buckner Steel ErectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000