Legal Opinion

Merchants National Bank v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ins.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided October 29, 1974No. 329Published

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, J.,

Without regard for procedural regularity, the parties to this action in assumpsit have requested the court to determine prehminarily the validity of the defense pleaded as new matter in defendant’s answer. The vehicle chosen to obtain such a determination is plaintiffs “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re: Defendant’s New Matter.” In order to induce the court to act on such motion, the parties have submitted an agreed statement of facts. It is only because there is agreement as to the facts and because both parties have consented to this procedure *450that we undertake at this time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hosler v. HurshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Schwartzfager v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Nash v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Konqueror Building & Loan Ass'n v. G. R. Kinney Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API