Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 12, 2009No. 08-10279Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Pro se Petitioner Stanley Hunter (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Petitioner argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to strike a specific juror. The district court did not err; we affirm.

In August 2002, Petitioner was charged with one count of first-degree murder. During voir dire, a potential juror, Ms. Drajem (“Drajem”), was asked whether she would be able to follow the court’s instructions during trial. She responded “I think so.” To another question about following the law as instructed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Payne v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API