Kenilworth Realty Co. v. Sandquist
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SIMON,
dissenting:
My view is that Kenilworth did not have a ready, willing and able buyer at any time prior to March 7, 1974, when Sandquist terminated Kenilworth’s agency. Because the February 1,1974, offer was contingent upon the prospective purchaser obtaining a mortgage, it was only a proposal without consideration for an option to purchase. Had Sandquist accepted the offer, Triangle Builders would have tied up the property for 20 days without any reciprocal obligation to Sandquist. Triangle Builders was free to walk away at the end of 20 days and recover its earnest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Katz v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Belleville National Savings Bank v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Sharkey v. SnowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Garrett v. BabbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.