Legal Opinion
Crescent Properties v. Inabinet
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 2006No. 03-CV-1449PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
Appellant, Crescent Properties, 1 brought an action against appellee, Margol Inabi-net, seeking a judgment for possession of her rental unit under the District of Columbia Residential Drug-Related Evictions Act of 1990 (“the RDEA”). 2 In its complaint, Crescent Properties alleged that Ms. Inabinet’s apartment was used as a drug haven. In a bench trial, the trial court ruled in favor of Ms. Inabinet, finding that Crescent Properties had established that Ms. Inabinet’s apartment had been a drug haven, but failed to prove that the unit remained a drug haven. On appeal,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gerald C. Bolton v. David W. Harris, Acting Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cahn v. Antioch UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cook v. Edgewood Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joyner v. Estate of JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jenkins v. StraussDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Feemster v. BSA Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Kingman Park Civic Ass'n v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.