Legal Opinion
Hertz Corp. v. Pugh
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 8, 1978No. EE-273PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
354 So.2d 966 (1978)
The HERTZ CORPORATION and Royal Indemnity Company, Appellants,
v.
Willie R. PUGH, Appellee.
No. EE-273.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 8, 1978.
Julian Bennett of Welch, Hilton, Bennett, Logue & Burke, Panama City, for appellants.
Richard Smoak of Isler, Higby, Brown, Smoak & Watson, Panama City, for appellee.
ERVIN, Judge.
Appellants appeal a summary final judgment holding that a liability insurance contract naming both Hertz and Wilson & Toomer as insureds, procured by Hertz's lessee, Toomer, did not show an intention to indemnify or insure Hertz for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Rigel v. National Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. AddisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Nixon v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Pafford v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of IndianaSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trizec Properties, Inc. v. Biltmore Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Nat. Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United Serv. Auto. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Morgan v. Continental Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Truck Discount Corp. v. SerranoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- LEASING, INC. v. HeiderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.