Legal Opinion

Poole v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 13, 2013No. 1120629PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

General Motors of Canada Limited (“GM Canada”) petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Choctaw Circuit Court to enter a summary judgment in its favor on the ground that the plaintiffs substitution of GM Canada for a fictitiously named defendant was made after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations and does not relate back to the filing of the original petition. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

Facts and Procedural History

The complaint in the underlying action was filed on April 6, 2009. It alleged that the plaintiff, Gerardo Poole, was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Ex Parte SnowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Templeton v. KyKenKee, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  2. Zak v. City of Arab (Ex parte Profit Boost Mktg., Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Ex parte VEL, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. Davis v. TK Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
  5. Ex parte Grisby Jacob Thompson PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Samuel Moore and Victor Sambade v. Grisby Jacob Thompson) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-17-902684).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API