Legal Opinion

United States v. JM Huber Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Motions to Dismiss Indictments.

Defendant, Western Newspaper Union, hereinafter WNU, moves to dismiss the indictment in each one of these cases. The only other defendants, J. M. Huber Corporation, in Cr. 159-149, and American Smelting & Refining Co., in Cr. 159-150, have pleaded nolo contendere, so that in each case the only remaining defendant is WNU.

Each indictment charges “an unlawful combination and conspiracy in restraint of * * * interstate trade and commerce in violation of section 1 of the Act of Congress of July 2, 1890, entitled ‘An Act to Protect Trade and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Local 167, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  4. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  2. United States v. Greater Syracuse Board of Realtors, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  3. United States v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. United States v. Bestway Disposal Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1988
  5. United States v. PirkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API