Legal Opinion
United States v. Three Parcels of Real Property
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1994No. Nos. 93-2511, 93-4036PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Gilbert and Samuel Dowdy appeal from a grant of summary judgment to the government in this 21 U.S.C. § 881 forfeiture action, arguing that the district court1 erred in requiring strict compliance with Admiralty Rule C(6), that the preseizure hearing was inadequate to meet the requirements of due process, and several additional constitutional claims. Because we find that it is no abuse of discretion to require strict compliance with Rule C(6), and that objection to the nature of the preseizure hearing was explicitly waived, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 20, 1990, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. 9638 Chicago HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Beechcraft Queen Airplane Serial Number Ld-24Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Terry L. Madewell v. Mike Downs, Anthony P. Grootens, and John PrineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at Tracts 10 & 11 of Lakeview HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Habchy v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Funds From Prudential SecuritiesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- United States v. $154,853.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.