Legal Opinion

Wickman v. Inland Waterways Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1948No. Civil Action 1397PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

This cause came before the Court on defendant’s motion for dismissal on the following grounds: (1) That the Court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the above action, which is a suit in tort brought against the Inland Waterways Corporation; (2) that the complaint does not state a cause of action or a basis on which relief can be granted against the defendant; and (3) that the defendant is exempt from all liability in the premises by the terms and provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 921 to 946, inclusive.

A motion in this proceeding on…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, Norman Scott v. Smithsonian InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Lomax Ex Rel. Lomax v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Schetter v. Housing Authority of the City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Gustafson v. PeckDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
  5. United States v. Delta Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API