Legal Opinion

Thomas v. City of Evanston

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 2, 1986No. 80 C 4803PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

For reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ second petition for a rule to show cause why the City should not be held in contempt is granted, but the order awarding retroactive seniority will be stayed pending the City’s forthcoming appeal of this Title VII suit.

In September 1984 the City signed a consent decree in which, among other things, it agreed to hire four class members within one year. The parties did not agree about issues such as back pay to the class and seniority for those class members hired. The Court decided these (and other) questions, granting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Robert Kenneth Dewey v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. Andrew F. Glick v. Jerome KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Knutson v. AG Processing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  2. United States v. Mansion House Center Redevelopment Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
  3. Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association-MEA-NEADistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  5. Malarkey v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API