Legal Opinion

Williams v. Scanlan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1986No. A14-86-313-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS

ROBERTSON, Justice.

We granted leave to determine whether a writ of mandamus should issue to vacate respondent’s order of April 15, 1986, naming a temporary guardian. We conditionally grant the mandamus.

Relator is the respondent/cross-petitioner in a divorce action commenced by her husband, Edward Jones “Pete” Williams, III, (Pete Williams), in the 245th Judicial District Court, Cause No. 86-03913. Temporary orders were entered by that court March 25, 1986, replaced by amended temporary orders April 8, 1986. Pete Williams was ordered to pay relator $7,250.00…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pullen v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Cruz v. Scanlan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re LiptakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  3. English v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. United Fire & Casualty Company v. Boring & Tunneling Company of America D/B/A Bortunco, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API