Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S.M.V.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 2009No. 05-07-01733-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG.

Following a jury trial on limited issues, appellant Fidel Valdez (“Valdez”) appeals the trial court’s order adjudicating parentage in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. In three issues, Valdez contends the trial court erred when it (1) ordered the name of minor child S.M. Valdez to be changed to S.M. Vo; (2) allowed appellee Crystal Valdez (“Mother”) to proceed with her case in chief and put on evidence with no pleading on file in this case; (3) “took it upon itself to order the clerk to file a pleading from another cause on behalf of [Mother] and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jason Felt, Canary Financial, Inc., Jonathan Wassserberg, and Wasserberg Investments, Inc. v. Comerica Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  2. Westview Drive Investments, LLC and Jack Yetiv v. Landmark American Insurance Co., and King-Phillips Insurance Agency, Inc. AKA Insurtrust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Corea v. BilekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Banker v. BankerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. In the Interest of W.C.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API