Legal Opinion

Clark v. California

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 16, 2010No. Case C 96-1486 CRBPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

I. Introduction and Background

1. The State of California, the Governor and various state prison officials initiated the current proceedings by bringing a motion pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b), to terminate the prospective relief in this case. That relief is contained in a 2001 Settlement Agreement and Order that requires these defendants to comply with a set of policies and procedures, known collectively as the Clark Remedial Plan (“CRP” or “Remedial Plan”), which they drafted…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. (HC) Murillo v. CDCR AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (PC) Ellis v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (PC)Hopkins v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC)Vera v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Braggs v. HammDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API