Legal Opinion

Christopher J. Scarver v. Jon Litscher

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 18, 2006No. 05-2999PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in this prisoner’s civil rights suit, Christopher Searver, contends that officials of the Wisconsin Secure Program Facility — nicknamed “Supermax”— violated his constitutional right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment. (“Supermax” actually is a generic term for “facilities or units designated for inmates who have been disruptive or violent while incarcerated and whose behavior can be controlled only by separation, restricted movement, and limited direct access to staff and other inmates, thereby excluding routine disciplinary segregation,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Anderson v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Robert Westefer, Mark Vonperbandt, Allejandro Villazana v. Donald Snyder, Odie Washington, Michael v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Angelo Clark v. Robert CoupeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. Berrell Freeman v. Gerald A. BergeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. CaroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  4. Thomas Powers v. Donald SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. James Lewis v. Angela McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API