Legal Opinion

Putco, Inc. v. Carjamz Com Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 10, 2021No. 3:20-cv-50109Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Putco, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff/ Counter-Defendant, ) ) Case No. 20 CV 50109 v. ) ) Magistrate Judge Lisa A. Jensen Carjamz Com Inc., ) ) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant’s motion for a protective order concerning Plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice [54] is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background Plaintiff Putco, Inc. filed suit against Defendant Carjamz Com Inc.1 on March 17, 2020, alleging infringement of two of its patents. Dkt. 1. The patents at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crespo v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Fannie B. Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Millen True Value Hardware and Millen HardwareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Iris Corp. Berhad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API