People v. Horton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The defendant’s statement was procured by police interrogation after the filing of a felony complaint and, therefore, it should have been suppressed (People v Samuels, 49 NY2d 218). Nevertheless, its receipt in evidence was harmless error, for there was no reasonable possibility that it might have contributed to the defendant’s conviction (People v Almestica, 42 NY2d 222; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). The proof was overwhelming that the defendant caused the death of the victim. Two eyewitnesses, both friends of defendant, testified that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GetchNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Andre D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992