Legal Opinion

People v. Horton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The defendant’s statement was procured by police interrogation after the filing of a felony complaint and, therefore, it should have been suppressed (People v Samuels, 49 NY2d 218). Nevertheless, its receipt in evidence was harmless error, for there was no reasonable possibility that it might have contributed to the defendant’s conviction (People v Almestica, 42 NY2d 222; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). The proof was overwhelming that the defendant caused the death of the victim. Two eyewitnesses, both friends of defendant, testified that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. GetchNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Andre D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API