Legal Opinion

Munden v. McDaniel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Smith (Peter P.), J.

The four separate causes of action alleged by the plaintiffs arise out of the alleged breach of a contract hiring the infant plaintiff “ as a stable boy and rider of horses.” The said first defense alleges in substance that the infant plaintiff was hired in Canada for an apprenticeship term of four years, and, among other things, subject to the reasonable rules and regulations of the Jockey Club of New York, and that said contract is void as against the public policy of the State of New York.

The contract is not annexed to either the complaint or the said answer as an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Barbour v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Putnam Machine Co. v. MustakangasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Aborn v. JanisNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ex parte Kunijiro ToguchiDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valdez v. Viking Athletic Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API