Reiners v. Brandhorst
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Van Vorst, J. —
The plaintiff, in her first cause of action, alleges that on or about the 28th day of December, 1875, one Henry A. Henken died in the city of Hew York leaving certain real estate. She further “alleges, on information and belief, that she, according to the laws of Hew York, is the only heir at law of the said deceased,” and was, “ as such heir' at law,” on the death of Henken, entitled to the property and the rents, issues and profits thereof. In the first cause of action the complaint alleges that two of the defendants have taken possession of the property and converted it to…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Sbarboro v. Health DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Roldan v. PowerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Fletcher v. MacGinnissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Martin v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Tuthill v. DebovoiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.